FILE FCP-52 HISTORICAL CASE FILE
Wirecard’s €1.9 billion cash shortfall and collapse
ASSESSMENT: Large-scale fraud is strongly supported, but individual roles and regulatory culpability must track adjudicated facts.
Documented findings, economic interpretation and unresolved claims are assessed separately.
Claim under review
Did executives fabricate revenue and trustee cash, while auditors and BaFin overlooked warnings?
Chronology
In June 2020 EY could not verify €1.9bn in trustee accounts; Wirecard said the cash likely did not exist and filed for insolvency. CEO Markus Braun was arrested; a Munich criminal trial began in 2022.
Court, regulatory and primary evidence
Company disclosure establishes the missing cash. Bundestag inquiry and ESMA peer review document separate company, audit and regulator failures; individual guilt awaits court findings.
Independent cross-checks
Independent corroboration: ESMA peer review of BaFin (2020) provides a separate record relevant to this case. Independent review of supervisory failures.
Competing account and limits
Executives disputed responsibility and cited outside partners. Missing cash is more certain than each accused person’s role; short-seller reports were not proof.
Evidence that could alter this assessment
Final trial judgments, trustee bank records, partner settlements and evidence about who created false confirmations.
Skeptical finding
Large-scale fraud is strongly supported, but individual roles and regulatory culpability must track adjudicated facts.
Annotated sources
- Bundestag Wirecard inquiry report (2021)Parliamentary investigation, not criminal verdict.
- ESMA peer review of BaFin (2020)Independent review of supervisory failures.
- Munich I Regional CourtCourt source for trial status and decisions.
Historical research only; not legal or investment advice.